Naked Bharatmata - Hussain has shown naked woman with names of states written on different parts of her body. He has used Ashok Chakra, Tri-colour in the painting. By doing this he has violated law & hurt National Pride of Indians. Both these things should be of grave concern to every Indian irrespective of his religion.
Muslim poets Faiz, Galib are shown well-clothed
Out of the four leaders M. Gandhi is decapitated and Hitler is naked. Hussain hates Hitler and has said in an interview 8 years ago that he has depicted Hitler naked to humiliate him and as he deserves it ! How come Hitler's nudity cause humiliation when in Hussain's own statement nudity in art depicts purity and is in fact an honour ! This shows Hussain's perversion and hypocrisy.
Full Clad Muslim King and naked Hindu Brahmin. The above painting clearly indicates Hussain's tendency to paint any Hindu as naked and thus his hatred.
Goddess Lakshmi naked on Shree Ganesh's head
Hussain's Daughter well clothed
1. Why don’t you visit Temples, Church, Gurudwaras etc?
2. Why did you depict only Hindu Gods and Goddess naked and with contempt?
One of the third grade Muslim politician raised a bounty of Rs. 50 Crore for the person who can slit the throat of cartoonist which made the cartoon of Prophet Mohammad. This all only confirms the aggressive nature of Muslims and their lopsided mind to destroy the non-Muslims. The opposite happened in case of Hussain. Muslims are well aware that M.F.Hussain has made the naked paintings of Hindu Gods and Goddess. But they never came forward to condemn him. Muslims did not raise any fatwa against him. There was not a single voice of protest against him. There were no mass protests, no processions, no effigy burning etc by Muslims. This shows the inherent implied support of Muslims to Hussain. In law, omission to commit an act is also considered as an act. Here too omission to support Hussain becomes an indirect support to Hussain. People well know that remaining silent on any issue means that person supported the issue.
Hussain is already on the right side of nineties and he can live for a maximum 5 or 6 years. After that he will die on his own. Even if people kill him, he will loose only 5 or 6 years of his life. He will not be deprived much of his life because most of which he has already lived. Moreover, this will also act as a deterrent to others. Minorities never act against the majority community in any country. This is the general rule in almost all the nations but it is really a pity that the opposite is taking place in India.
Readers may not agree with my form of punishment. They will talk of law and legal procedure. That procedure is also acceptable to me provided that it is done in an expeditious way and there remains a guarantee that the culprit will definitely be punished. It is not as if I dont believe in law but there are certain things which have to be don’t outside the law also. Everything cannot be done according to the law. People know very well that legal recourse in India takes sufficient time and this cannot be denied. For urgent disposal of issues like that of Hussain we need to go outside the law only. This has been done in most of the nations.
Muslim poets Faiz, Galib are shown well-clothed
Out of the four leaders M. Gandhi is decapitated and Hitler is naked. Hussain hates Hitler and has said in an interview 8 years ago that he has depicted Hitler naked to humiliate him and as he deserves it ! How come Hitler's nudity cause humiliation when in Hussain's own statement nudity in art depicts purity and is in fact an honour ! This shows Hussain's perversion and hypocrisy.
Full Clad Muslim King and naked Hindu Brahmin. The above painting clearly indicates Hussain's tendency to paint any Hindu as naked and thus his hatred.
Goddess Lakshmi naked on Shree Ganesh's head
Hussain's Daughter well clothed
M.F. Hussain's Mother fully clothed
Well clothed Muslim Lady
Naked Shri Parvati
Naked Lord Hanuman and Goddess Sita sitting on thigh of Ravana
Goddess Durga in sexual union with Tiger
M.F. Hussain or Maqbool Fida Hussain, the great painter of India, now in his nineties has always been known for his paintings, exhibitions and controversies. Though I used to revere him much previously and liked his infatuation for Madhuri Dixit but I lost all my regard and respect for him when I witnessed his above described nude and denigatory paintings. Hussain has been in controversies since a long time, perhaps since 1982 when he made his first naked painting which depicted his anti-Hindu nature for the first time. Very recently he again invited the ire of the Hindus by making a painting of naked Bharat Mata, which I would say was really a very shameful peace of work on his behalf. It now seems that Hussain has developed some form of proclivity of insulting Hindu gods and goddess. A number of anti-Hindu paintings have been made by him, all have been pasted above. Now, the readers are left to themselves to decide that whether Hussain is a skunk or a mercy deserving person.
Perusal of the Paintings
If one goes through the paintings minutely then one hall find that most of the gods and goddess, which are revered the most by the Hindus, have been painted full naked and some are even shown having sex with animals. This is really the worst form of insult which a person can do. It is noteworthy that it is Hussain only which initiated the depiction of our gods and goddess in such a way. The opposers may argue that nudity is a part of Hinduism and Ellora and Ajanta caves contain nude idols and sculptors. It may be true that nudity may be a part of Hindu culture but the intention and the way in which the depiction is done is to be considered.
There is a big difference between what Hussain has painted and what is there in Ajanta and Ellora. The idols, sculptures of Ellora and Ajanta depict an art, a creation which are a part of life. They were created in good faith only to understand the different facets of life. The most important thing is that they were created with a bona fide intention and not with any other evil feeling. In Hussains paintings the opposite holds true. He made paintings only to insult the Hindu gods and goddess, which a person can easily gauge by looking the paintings above. I have following queries to Mr. Hussain:
1. Why almost all gods and goddess have been shown naked?
2. Why goddess are shown having sex with animals?
3. Why some gods or eminent Hindu persons have been shown decapitated?
4. Why is a Muslim women shown in full clothes?
5. Why is a Christian Mother Teresa shown in full clothes?
6. Why are Muslim poets shown decently and not Gandhi and Hitler?
I invite Mr.Hussain to answer my questions and if gives a satisfactory reply to me or to the people in general then I would withdraw my article from the blog.
There is a big difference between what Hussain has painted and what is there in Ajanta and Ellora. The idols, sculptures of Ellora and Ajanta depict an art, a creation which are a part of life. They were created in good faith only to understand the different facets of life. The most important thing is that they were created with a bona fide intention and not with any other evil feeling. In Hussains paintings the opposite holds true. He made paintings only to insult the Hindu gods and goddess, which a person can easily gauge by looking the paintings above. I have following queries to Mr. Hussain:
1. Why almost all gods and goddess have been shown naked?
2. Why goddess are shown having sex with animals?
3. Why some gods or eminent Hindu persons have been shown decapitated?
4. Why is a Muslim women shown in full clothes?
5. Why is a Christian Mother Teresa shown in full clothes?
6. Why are Muslim poets shown decently and not Gandhi and Hitler?
I invite Mr.Hussain to answer my questions and if gives a satisfactory reply to me or to the people in general then I would withdraw my article from the blog.
Hussain-------A True Muslim
Very few people know that Hussain is a five time namaji, which shows his hardcore commitment towards his religion. Now his paintings have confirmed that he is only a true Muslim. It is widely known that Muslims love to flout, insult, denigrate and belittle all religions except Islam. The same thing was done by Hussain too. Muslims have no respect for any other religion or any idol or any God except their own. This is evident from many instances----destruction of Bamiyan Buddha in Afghanistan by Taliban, destruction of temples in India by Muslims when they were the rulers, continuous plummeting and destruction of the temples in Muslim nations, attacks on Churches and Gurudwaras in Muslim countries etc. Hussain falsely proclaims that he respects all religions and believes in multi-religiosity and muti-culturalism. He advocates widely that a nation should have a multi cultural society. All his claims remain absurd and this is proved by my two simple questions:
1. Why don’t you visit Temples, Church, Gurudwaras etc?
2. Why did you depict only Hindu Gods and Goddess naked and with contempt?
It would be senseless to go in detail to prove his nature of a true Muslim. One may argue that he is a modern man, with most advance life style and way of living. He also has one of the most modern thoughts. It may be accepted that he has a most modern life style and modern thoughts but does that mean that he does not believe in Islam or he has forgetted his religion. What is the guarantee that if a person is very modern and advance then he does not believe in his religion?. I think that this all remains suffice to confirm that he is a true Muslim and is thus serving his religion, by hook or by crook.
Why are Muslims silent?
As said previously, Muslims like insulting other religions. So, if their co-religionist does the same thing then should they protest against it? The answer which can be anticipated is only a big “NO” and exactly this happened. Islam asks Muslims not to oppose their co-religionist, howsoever wrong they may be and this was only done by the fellow Muslims. It should also be noted that in our daily life if we find any Muslim committing any wrong then any other Muslim will always try to defend his co-religionist, directly or indirectly. Few months ago, the world witnessed huge protests and processions when Denmark, a Christian nation published the photos of Prophet Mohammad, with a bomb on his cap. There were fatwas, widespread processions, slogans against Denmark and Christians from every Muslim nation. Even the Muslims of India did not lag behind. There were processions, effigy burning by Muslims in India too, where they are considered as a minority.
One of the third grade Muslim politician raised a bounty of Rs. 50 Crore for the person who can slit the throat of cartoonist which made the cartoon of Prophet Mohammad. This all only confirms the aggressive nature of Muslims and their lopsided mind to destroy the non-Muslims. The opposite happened in case of Hussain. Muslims are well aware that M.F.Hussain has made the naked paintings of Hindu Gods and Goddess. But they never came forward to condemn him. Muslims did not raise any fatwa against him. There was not a single voice of protest against him. There were no mass protests, no processions, no effigy burning etc by Muslims. This shows the inherent implied support of Muslims to Hussain. In law, omission to commit an act is also considered as an act. Here too omission to support Hussain becomes an indirect support to Hussain. People well know that remaining silent on any issue means that person supported the issue.
The Best Punishment
I believe in tit for tat. Husaain has committed a grave wrong and for this he should get the punishment.He has insulted the feelings and sentiments of the crores of the people and so people should have the right to grant him the punishment. He has committed the offence twice and that too intentionally. So, the best form of punishment for him would be to take away his life. To deal with the Muslims, it is pivotal to deal in their own way. That strategy can only work. Being lenient has always cost us and it is still proving hard on us. So, Hussain deserves to be killed now. His offence is grave and serious. The most important thing is that he has committed the offence twice and that too intentionally. A person may be pardoned once but not twice. Hindus showed mercy on him by leaving him in 1982 but now when he has again committed the offence, he deserves the harshest punishment.
Hussain is already on the right side of nineties and he can live for a maximum 5 or 6 years. After that he will die on his own. Even if people kill him, he will loose only 5 or 6 years of his life. He will not be deprived much of his life because most of which he has already lived. Moreover, this will also act as a deterrent to others. Minorities never act against the majority community in any country. This is the general rule in almost all the nations but it is really a pity that the opposite is taking place in India.
Readers may not agree with my form of punishment. They will talk of law and legal procedure. That procedure is also acceptable to me provided that it is done in an expeditious way and there remains a guarantee that the culprit will definitely be punished. It is not as if I dont believe in law but there are certain things which have to be don’t outside the law also. Everything cannot be done according to the law. People know very well that legal recourse in India takes sufficient time and this cannot be denied. For urgent disposal of issues like that of Hussain we need to go outside the law only. This has been done in most of the nations.